David Lyon published the article “Surveillance, Power, and
Everyday Life”. Lyon was a Sociology and
Law professor at Queens University in Kingston, Ontario. He is best known for his Surveillance study
works. In fact, he is director of the Surveillance Study Center at Queens
University. He has published a fair amount of books including Liquid Surveillance, Identifying Citizens:
ID Cards as Surveillance, and most recently The International Handbook of Surveillance Studies (Lyon). Based on
these publications and professions, Lyon has the credibility to argue and
analyze points on surveillance. This
article is from Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication
Technologies, which was
published in 2007, around the time that search engines, satellite navigation on
phones, and social medias came into place. This article is intended for anyone
who is in contact with any type of technology. I think adults should be the
most concerned about the issue with surveillance, but the article is intended
for a broader audience.
The main point of this article is that surveillance is
evolving and growing at a rapid pace. Within recent years, the surveillance is
growing around ICT’s as well. As technology becomes more adavaneces,
surveillance does too. There is now more access to record data and to keep
track of society’s patterns. Lyon describes surveillance as “any focused
attention to personal details for the purposed of influence, management, or
control” (Lyon). An interesting point brought up is that surveillance isnt only
for the consumers; surveillance can be used to watch employees as well. This
relates to an article we read a while back, Rise
of the Reingineers, by Simon Head. This article talked about how businesses
used surveillance to track their employees actions, behavior, and to track
customers purchase patterns (Head). In Lyon’s article, he proposes that
companies and government can classify people by their purchasing patterns and
shopping patterns, which is called social sorting. Social sorting is supposed
to help companies better their market to their consumers. This allows for
companies to target a particular audience. Lyon explains that social sorting
can be a pro or a con. He says that when people are put into certain
categories, they can obtain benefits, but also can be excluded from
participation in a certain marketplace. Lyon also introduces the question of
‘is privacy ending’? Many people argue that privacy is ending because there
are fewer places to hide out and be
alone. Surveillence systems track our every move and it seems that we are never
in privacy. Others celebrate the fact that privacy is over because it means
that personal data is constantly cicrulating.
Surveillence is a complex topic that has many different
views. Some surveillence such as baby monitors and personal tracking of
purchases can be seen as a good thing. On the flip side, government tracking of
personal purchases and the unknown of when you are being surveilled is a scary
thing. Lyon’s argument about surveillence in society and the control of power
in surveillene faces many difficulties today.
Related article:
Murphy, K.
(2014, October 4). We want privacy but can’t stop sharing. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/sunday-review/we-want-privacy-but-cant-stop-sharing.html?_r=0
Timberg, C. (2014, February 5). New surveillance
technology can track everyone in an area for several hours at a
time. Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-surveillance-technology-can-track-everyone-in-an-area-for-several-hours-at-a-time/2014/02/05/82f1556e-876f-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html
References:
Simon Head, "The rise of the reengineers," in The New
Ruthless Economy (2003).
David
Lyon, “Surveillance, power, and everyday life,” in R. Mansell et al. eds., The
Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies (2007).
David
Lyon: The New Transparency. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.sscqueens.org/davidlyon
No comments:
Post a Comment